Recently, Musk wanted to acquire Twitter, and his aim was the same. In a word, the governance model and economic model are fundamentally different from before, which is the general trend. That means, in Web3.0, a user is no longer a traditional concept of a user, he is both a producer and a consumer. In terms of benefit distribution, users are also allowed to join through the Token mechanism. Even the company that developed BitProxy cannot interfere with users. The entire network is no longer controlled by any centralized organization. However, after migrating to the TOP chain, it has become a decentralized application. Taking the application BitVPN on the TOP public chain as an example, it was a completely centralized application before it was migrated to the TOP chain.
It will be more democratic in web 3.0, users can participate in the governance and jointly decide on the share. For example, in the We2.0 model, the share ratio is determined by Apple.
Second, the distribution of benefits will be more equal and democratized. In Web 3.0, fundamental changes have taken place in the governance model and economic model, that is, users can join in the governance equally, and the power of centralized dictators has dropped a lot. There is already a certain extent of sharing of interests, but the method of sharing is completely dictatorial, and the company has the final say. For example, you can also get advertising fees by uploading a video on YouTube or TikTok. However, a step forward has been made in the distribution of benefits, and developers can get some. This kind of production relationship and governance model is still a dictatorial model and completely controlled by Apple. Apple may just remove your app from the store for no reason. Developers often encounter a very difficult problem. This is a very good We2.0 mode, but this mode is still very dangerous. When developers develop apps and upload them to the APP store, Apple gets 30% of the benefits, and developers get 70%. The App Store of Apple is a typical example of We2.0. Of course, some benefits will be distributed to users. The so-called major progress of production relations is that content is produced by users, but the content is still owned by centralized giants. The arrival of We2.0 is actually a huge improvement in production relations, but the governance model is still the original one. In the Web 1.0 era, everything belongs to a centralized company, and everything such as information and revenue is in the hands of the company, which is a relatively backward production relationship. At the end of 2021, Zuckerberg said that he would "be the successor of the mobile Internet" and changed Facebook's name to "Meta", pushing the concept of web3 to a new high.įrom an abstract perspective, Web1.0, We2.0, and Web3.0 are the progress of the times in production relations and governance models. In the imagination of Web3.0, there will be no monopoly on the Internet in the future, and everyone will join in the governance of the online community and share benefits. The concept of Web3.0 originated from the decentralized Internet proposed by Gavin Wood, one of the founders of Ethereum in 2014.
The following content has been edited from Steve's comments. In the panel, Steve analyzed the essential difference between Web 3.0 and Web 1.0 & Web 2.0, introduced the business model of Web 3.0 in detail, and also deeply analyzed the role of DAO in Web 3.0.
#Networkview owner how to#
At 21:00 EST on April 15th, TOP Network co-founder Steve was invited to a panel on how to implement Web 3.0 held by TSVC and MITCEO.
0 kommentar(er)
